How programmes are evaluated
Modules, Teaching Units, grades, pass rules and graduation decisions are presented in a compact, readable way below.
This page brings together essential academic rules and practical procedures: assessment, integrity, extensions, deferrals, retakes, studies and disabilities, and the people to contact.
DSTI’s academic framework is deliberately structured: professors define assessment within modules, Direction of Studies follows progression and requests, and formal committees remain sovereign for graduation and disciplinary matters.
Modules, Teaching Units, grades, pass rules and graduation decisions are presented in a compact, readable way below.
Extensions, deferrals and retakes follow clear routes, forms and deadlines through Direction of Studies and the support platform.
Students or applicants concerned by a disability or medical situation should contact DSTI early so the situation can be reviewed properly.
The assessment framework applies to Bachelor and MSc programmes, across study modes and rhythms, unless a specific programme rule states otherwise.
Programmes are composed of Teaching Units, each made of one or several modules. Modules may include lectures, practicals or a mix of both, and all modules are evaluated.
On-Campus study requires mandatory physical attendance, and Live Streamed students must be connected with audio and video on. Online student assiduity is followed through Direction of Studies meetings and DSTI Learn activity logs.
Assessment may include final examinations, intermediate examinations, coursework, attendance and participation. Professors announce the nature of assessment for their modules.
Grades are expressed out of 100 and rounded to the nearest multiple of five. A course and a Teaching Unit are acquired at 60%. Graduation requires a global average of at least 60%. Only one course per Teaching Unit is allowed to be failed. In all cases, the DSTI Graduation Committee is sovereign.
Academic integrity is part of DSTI’s engineering culture. Students are responsible for the authenticity of every exam, assignment, paper, report, project or document they submit.
Students must check that their work contains no plagiarism. Sources must be quoted and included in the bibliography where relevant.
Communication with other candidates, unauthorised documents, materials or equipment, suspicious online activity and shared answers may trigger disciplinary review.
When generative AI tools are used as part of an assignment or student work, that use must be mentioned. Undeclared use, or use that wholly replaces human work, is treated as plagiarism.
Requests should be made early, through the support platform, with the correct form and evidence where required. Direction of Studies and the relevant professor review requests according to the applicable policy.
For full-time students. Requests must be submitted before the deadline. Extensions are normally up to 10 working days and carry no fee.
For full-time students. Deferrals concern serious extenuating circumstances and usually move the assessment to the next cohort. Evidence is required.
For full-time and Online students. Retake requests should normally be made within five working days after the grade is made available.
| Procedure | Timing | Evidence | Application deadline | Fee |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deadline extension | Maximum 10 working days | Optional | Before submission date | No fee |
| Deferral of Assessment | With next cohort | Mandatory | Normally before the assessment, with limited retrospective windows for extenuating circumstances | €60 / €110 |
| Retake of assessment | With next cohort | Optional for a first retake; mandatory for a second retake | Within five working days after the grade is made available | €60 / €110 |
DSTI School of Engineering aims to provide an inclusive learning environment while remaining transparent about the practical and academic requirements of its programmes.
If you are concerned by a disability, a medical situation or a possible need for reasonable adjustments, contact the team as soon as you apply. Each situation is reviewed individually.
DSTI’s position is to be clear from the beginning: accommodations are reviewed early and case by case, so applicants and students understand what can be supported within the requirements of the programme.
The Disability Advisor provides individual support and facilitates the educational integration of students with disabilities.
laurence.crucifix@dsti.institute
04 89 41 29 44
Because DSTI programmes involve technical computing, examinations, professional projects and hands-on work, some situations may be incompatible with study or assessment at DSTI. The school reviews this carefully and transparently.
Assessment requests, progression questions and support matters should be handled through the proper DSTI channel so they can be tracked and reviewed consistently.
Extensions, deferrals, retakes and progression questions should be submitted through the DSTI support platform, with the relevant form and evidence where required.
These official and specialist resources are in French. They may help students understand recognition, rights and support pathways in France.
For admissions-stage questions, speak with Admissions. For an enrolled student request, use the support platform so Direction of Studies can review the situation properly.